By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Magadh Today - Beyond HeadlinesMagadh Today - Beyond HeadlinesMagadh Today - Beyond Headlines
  • Home
  • India
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Global
  • Technology
  • Science
  • Asia
  • Business
  • Finance
Reading: Court documents underscore Meta’s `historical reluctance’ to protect children on Instagram
Share
Notification Show More
Aa
Magadh Today - Beyond HeadlinesMagadh Today - Beyond Headlines
Aa
  • India
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
  • Science
  • Home
  • Technology
  • Business
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Sitemap
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Magadh Today - Beyond Headlines > Latest News > Global > Court documents underscore Meta’s `historical reluctance’ to protect children on Instagram
GlobalUnited States

Court documents underscore Meta’s `historical reluctance’ to protect children on Instagram

Gulshan Kumar
Last updated: 2024/01/18 at 5:22 PM
By Gulshan Kumar 1 year ago
Share
SHARE

SAN FRANCISCO — Newly unredacted documents from New Mexico’s lawsuit against Meta underscore the company’s “historical reluctance” to keep children safe on its platforms, the complaint says.

New Mexico’s Attorney General Raul Torrez sued Facebook and Instagram owner Meta in December, saying the company failed to protect young users from exposure to child sexual abuse material and allowed adults to solicit explicit imagery from them.

In the passages freshly unredacted from the lawsuit Wednesday, internal employee messages and presentations from 2020 and 2021 show Meta was aware of issues such as adult strangers being able to contact children on Instagram, the sexualization of minors on that platform, and the dangers of its “people you may know” feature that recommends connections between adults and children. But Meta dragged its feet when it came to addressing the issues, the passages show.

Instagram, for instance, began restricting adults’ ability to message minors in 2021. One internal document referenced in the lawsuit shows Meta “scrambling in 2020 to address an Apple executive whose 12-year-old was solicited on the platform, noting ‘this is the kind of thing that pisses Apple off to the extent of threating to remove us from the App Store.”‘ According to the complaint, Meta “knew that adults soliciting minors was a problem on the platform, and was willing to treat it as an urgent problem when it had to.”

In a July 2020 document titled “Child Safety — State of Play (7/20),” Meta listed “immediate product vulnerabilities” that could harm children, including the difficulty reporting disappearing videos and confirmed that safeguards available on Facebook were not always present on Instagram. At the time, Meta’s reasoning was that it did not want to block parents and older relatives on Facebook from reaching out to their younger relatives, according to the complaint. The report’s author called the reasoning “less than compelling” and said Meta sacrificed children’s safety for a “big growth bet.” In March 2021, though, Instagram announced it was restricting people over 19 from messaging minors.

In a July 2020 internal chat, meanwhile, one employee asked, “What specifically are we doing for child grooming (something I just heard about that is happening a lot on TikTok)?” The response from another employee was, “Somewhere between zero and negligible. Child safety is an explicit non-goal this half” (likely meaning half-year), according to the lawsuit.

In a statement, Meta said it wants teens to have safe, age-appropriate experiences online and has spent “a decade working on these issues and hiring people who have dedicated their careers to keeping young people safe and supported online. The complaint mischaracterizes our work using selective quotes and cherry-picked documents.”

Instagram also failed to address the issue of inappropriate comments under posts by minors, the complaint says. That’s something former Meta engineering director Arturo Bejar recently testified about. Bejar, known for his expertise on curbing online harassment, recounted his own daughter’s troubling experiences with Instagram.

“I appear before you today as a dad with firsthand experience of a child who received unwanted sexual advances on Instagram,” he told a panel of U.S. senators in November. “She and her friends began having awful experiences, including repeated unwanted sexual advances, harassment.”

A March 2021 child safety presentation noted that Meta is “underinvested in minor sexualization on (Instagram), notable on sexualized comments on content posted by minors. Not only is this a terrible experience for creators and bystanders, it’s also a vector for bad actors to identify and connect with one another.” The documents underscore the social media giant’s “historical reluctance to institute appropriate safeguards on Instagram,” the lawsuit says, even when those safeguards were available on Facebook.

Meta said it uses sophisticated technology, hires child safety experts, reports content to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and shares information and tools with other companies and law enforcement, including state attorneys general, to help root out predators.

Meta, which is based in Menlo Park, California, has been updating its safeguards and tools for younger users as lawmakers pressure it on child safety, though critics say it has not done enough. Last week, the company announced it will start hiding inappropriate content from teenagers’ accounts on Instagram and Facebook, including posts about suicide, self-harm and eating disorders.

New Mexico’s complaint follows the lawsuit filed in October by 33 states that claim Meta is harming young people and contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly and deliberately designing features on Instagram and Facebook that addict children to its platforms.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, along with the CEOs of Snap, Discord, TikTok and X, formerly Twitter, are scheduled to testify before the U.S. Senate on child safety at the end of January.

By AP

You Might Also Like

US working to prevent Turkiye offensive in Syria

US, Canadian, Australian travellers face UK entry fee

Britain bans islamic investment group’s ‘offensive’ ads’

Trudeau rejects Trump’s idea of forcing Canada to become a US state

Drone slips past Israel’s air defence, hits Tel Aviv

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Reddit Telegram Copy Link Print
Previous Article A federal official says the part that blew off from a Alaska airlines jet was made in Malaysia by a Boeing supplier
Next Article Trudeau defends Jamaica trip as committee aggres to seek ethics watchdog’s testimony
about us

Your daily dose of news and updates on politics, culture, and events around the globe. Stay informed, stay connected!

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Magadh Today - Beyond HeadlinesMagadh Today - Beyond Headlines
© Magadh Today Network. All Rights Reserved.
Go to mobile version
adbanner
AdBlock Detected
Our site is an advertising supported site. Please whitelist to support our site.
Okay, I'll Whitelist
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?