In the ever-changing landscape of international cricket, concerns mount over the future of Test cricket, especially for teams outside the Big Three – India, Australia, and England. The implications of fewer India tours are impacting the financial dynamics and scheduling challenges for cricket boards worldwide.
South Africa’s Dilemma and the SA20 League
Cricket South Africa finds itself in a complex situation with its SA20 franchise league, accused of devaluing Test cricket and diverting players from international Test matches. Former South Africa captain Graeme Smith, now commissioner of SA20, defends the league as a means to secure a better financial future for players, despite facing criticism for its impact on Test cricket.
Financial Disparities and India’s Dominance
While leagues like SA20 struggle to contribute significantly to cricket boards’ revenues, the value of international Test series, particularly involving India, remains unparalleled. The just-concluded India series against South Africa, worth nearly $70 million, stands out as a financial boon for Cricket South Africa, compensating for past losses. The financial returns from India tours often exceed annual shares from the ICC.
Challenges for Cricket Boards Outside the Big Three
Cricket boards outside the Big Three face challenges in selling bilateral rights, with Test cricket becoming a casualty in lean tours programs. The financial burden of hosting Test matches, coupled with the dominance of franchise leagues, leaves boards dependent on India tours for significant revenue generation.
Impact of WTC Format and India’s Reduced Away Tests
The World Test Championship (WTC) format has inadvertently led to India playing fewer away Tests. The BCCI has streamlined its Test calendar, reducing India’s Test matches from 52 to 36 in the WTC cycle (2019-27). This reduction affects countries like South Africa, West Indies, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh, who see fewer Tests scheduled with India.
CSA’s Prioritization of White-Ball Cricket
Cricket South Africa has consciously prioritized white-ball cricket over Tests, with only 28 Tests scheduled in the current FTP (2023-27), compared to England’s 43, Australia’s 40, and India’s 38. The decision reflects the challenges faced by cricket boards in balancing the international calendar and hosting Tests with the associated costs.
The Struggle for Financial Self-Sustainability
The financial sustainability of Test cricket remains uncertain, with cricket boards grappling to attract broadcast interest for non-India action. The reliance on Indian stars and the absence of a Test Cricket Fund, promised even in the Big Three’s controversial ‘position paper,’ raise questions about the long-term sustenance of Test cricket.
As Test cricket grapples with financial challenges and varying levels of interest, the universal sustenance of the format raises concerns. A more equitable WTC and the absence of a Test Cricket Fund underline the need for a comprehensive strategy to ensure the financial self-sustainability of Test cricket.
